Talk:Glossary of architecture
|WikiProject Architecture||(Rated Start-class, Top-importance)|
What is perceived repetition in architecture?
People saying "please add term"
If you think something belongs to the list, add it. That's what Wikipedia is about. If you don't know what it means, take 2 seconds to look it up in a dictionary (or dictionary.com) first. -- 184.108.40.206 22:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
This article should be at Glossary of architectural terms, or Glossary of architecture, or at least Architectural glossary. Can someone with a bot move this and fix all the redirects? — BRIAN0918 • 2006-08-20 20:16
- I'd be happy with any of those suggestions - which is the most commonly used for glossaries in wikipedia?--Mcginnly | Natter 13:27, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Move to Wiktionary
This page has been proposed as a test of whether the page should/could be better maintained in Wiktionary. Please see the copy being developed at wikt:Appendix:Architectural glossary. Rossami (talk) 20:41, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message
|This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.
--CopyToWiktionaryBot 08:46, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
just a minor point - the term 'bressumer' is out of alphabetical order. 220.127.116.11 19:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.trailend.org/article-architecture.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. NortyNort (Holla) 11:10, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Distinction between architecture and building terms
It is difficult to separate architecture and building. I find most of the terms here to be building terms. The history of architecture page makes the following distinction: "This article describes the history of building types and styles—what things were built. See History of construction for the history of construction tools and techniques—how things were built." Perhaps this page name should include "and Building". I placed this gloss in Category:Construction terminology to help people looking at that page to know about this page but I do not know how to link this page to the Category:Construction terminology which acts as a glossary of sorts. Jim Derby (talk) 13:03, 12 December 2012 (UTC)