Talk:Google Fiber

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Google (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Computing (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Internet (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Let's cite sources[edit]

Main page: WP:CITE

citing some website:
<ref name=" "> {{cite web
| url=
| title=
| publisher=
}} </ref>

citing an actual newspaper or magazine:
<ref name=" "> {{cite news  
| last=  
| first=  
| url=  
| title=  
| publisher=  
| date=  
}} </ref>

Heroeswithmetaphors (talk) 16:18, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Cost section not clear[edit]

Is it Google or will it be the end users who will pay for the connection?Jasper Deng (talk) 05:01, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

@Jasper: "We plan to offer ultra high-speed Internet access directly to consumers at an affordable price. We look forward to sharing more information as we begin to develop more specific plans." --from http://googlefiberblog.blogspot.com/. Mushabisi (talk) 04:42, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

possible locations list[edit]

in the possible locations list, it says "The following communities have submitted a Google Fiber bid:" and lists some communities. I'm confused, does this mean that JUST those communities have submitted proposals or that those are just SOME of the communities that have submitted proposals? I have a feeling it might be the latter (mostly because earlier in the article it says something about 1,100 communities) but wasn't clear to me so i didn't change it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stoopkitty (talkcontribs) 00:56, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

It does not mean only those communities. I have edited the list header to reflect this. Rabbitfang (talk) 04:10, 20 June 2010 (UTC)


Reno is also submitted —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.197.122.47 (talk) 18:11, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Simple math[edit]

The article claims that broadband speeds of 1 gigabit per second are about 100 times faster than what "most Americans" have (whatever that means). It then goes on to say that the average american has a broadband speed of 4 megabits per second. Well, 1Gbps is actually considerably more than 100 times faster than 4Mbps. It's actually 256 times faster. Although, the ambiguity of the "most Americans" quasi-statistic makes it unclear if "most Americans" is different from "the average American". I think some clarification is needed here. Also, the source listed for this sentence does not mention anything about proposed speeds. For more information about google fiber..visit..http://www.techienity.com/google-fiber-extremist-speed-internet/

 SnottyWong chat 01:43, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
I agree that it's ambiguous. If you don't think it belongs, delete it.Jasper Deng (talk) 02:51, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
"What most Americans have" would best be known from here: NetIndex.com. ₪RicknAsia₪ 18:27, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

List[edit]

I tried to add the whole list from google since the one there is incomplete. Since a user just deleted the list someone else can put it back so I can't be accused of doing an edit war. I don't know why they don't want the article to be informative, and I don't know why if they did not like the list I put up they couldn't just make it better instead of just deleting it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 7y7y7u (talkcontribs) 23:57, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

I'd like to have the list expanded, but Wikipedia uses third-party sources too. The syntax you used was incorrect-each new bullet is started with * right before the bullet's text. You use an extra * if you want a sub-bullet. Two lists would be cumbersome, and that's the reason it was deleted. However, accusing us wrongly of wanting the article to be not informative is strongly discouraged.


Comments on talk pages are headed with ==<subject>==, and you should sign your comments by typing four tildes immediately after.


Jasper Deng (talk) 02:08, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Jasper thanks for not biting. Nakon decided to bite by just deleting and not being collaborative or discussing, don't get why they weren't edit warring since they were being destructive rather than constructive. Well, I tried. Good luck. 7y7y7u (talk) 14:54, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Nakon and I were following Wikipedia's rules on formatting. We both gave clear reasons why we deleted the content. I however have to say, your edits here can't be considered constructive given that they don't follow Wikipedia's policies. Concerning edit wars, I don't think Nakon should have any responsibility for them given that he was merely following Wikipedia policy. See WP:Welcome for some details.Jasper Deng (talk) 18:31, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Google Fiber, Cloud computing, and Chrome OS[edit]

In my view, all of these are connected. I would suggest a new section talking about how they are interlinked. Casprings (talk) 18:38, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Privacy concerns?[edit]

Anyone have any information re: how & to what extent Google will collect user data and/or analyze and/or resell that data? Obvious answer: "as much as possible," but does anyone have anything more specific? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.176.50.169 (talk) 00:53, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Wireless Router?[edit]

It is stated that a router is "included with all packages" but that isn't one of the things listed in the included hardware above. Which is it? Does a router come with the service? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.167.79.105 (talk) 20:28, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

The Network Box is a wireless router. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:470:1F10:1BC:0:0:0:2 (talk) 02:33, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Coming to Austin[edit]

Looks like Austin, Texas is Google's next build-out target:

http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/5/4187994/google-fiber-could-expand-to-austin-as-city-preps-for-joint-announcement

...I'll let you guys update the article...it's clearly not a 100% confirmed certainty yet. SteveBaker (talk) 12:50, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Google Fiber in Provo.[edit]

Here's another Wikipedia article that may shed more light on the Provo deal. iProvo

Link added. Thanks! K8 fan (talk) 03:11, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Internet vs. internet in this article[edit]

User:Rreagan007 and I have been making edits to change between internet and Internet through a couple rounds of edits and reverts now. My last revert included the edit summary 'Internet is a proper noun and so should be capitalized' and his last revert said 'whether "internet" is a common or proper noun is disputed Capitalization of "Internet" '. I agree that the uncapitalized version is coming into more common use. But, while we can't say that either style is definitively right or wrong, I think that we should try to be consistent across English Wikipedia articles and that capitalizing Internet is preferred. If you look at the main Internet article for example, you'll see "Internet" rather than "internet". The same is true for most other Wikipedia articles that talk about the Internet. I'll note that the Google fiber website capitalizes Internet. The Chicago Manual of Style (16th Edition) includes this example in section 7.76: "Internet protocol (IP); the Internet; the net; an internet". So, I'll wait a few days to see if this note draws any helpful comments. Depending on what develops, I may switch things back to use capital I Internet. --Jeff Ogden (W163) (talk) 17:41, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

I agree with you that a consistent usage across English Wikipedia would be good. Perhaps you can start a thread about this topic on a Manual of Style talk page to get a broader discussion going about this. Rreagan007 (talk) 17:47, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Provo info out of date[edit]

The article describes "plans underway" for Austin and Provo. Austin is still that way, but Provo is now online. Go to fiber.google.com. It's there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.248.151.176 (talk) 03:34, 16 January 2014 (UTC)