|WikiProject Computing||(Rated C-class, Mid-importance)|
|WikiProject Google||(Rated C-class, Mid-importance)|
Speaking of Rocks, a few need to be thrown at Google for once again raizing us (in restriction of a word I WILL not use) of the ability to customize our own browsing experience, and reminding US exactly who's "in charge".
The article effectively criticises Sidewiki for not being controllable by the site owner, ignoring the view that this may actually be a good thing.
It seems to me the whole point is to enable visitors to a website to post comments, be they positive or negative, as long as they aren't abusive. If webmasters could disable it, it would be the dream of dodgy dealers and those with an agenda to spread lies, among others.
Alternatives to Sidewiki?
Are there any good alternatives? The Foresight Institute used to run Crit.org, but that died years ago. The current website is totally unrelated.18.104.22.168 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:30, 2 November 2011 (UTC).