Talk:Google Web Toolkit
|WikiProject Google||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
|WikiProject Java||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
- 1 Why this page is merged
- 2 The CRITICISM section needs to be rewritten in English
- 3 The criticism section is incorrect
- 4 GWT is not a software development framework
- 5 GWT implemets Synchronized call
- 6 does "Other Frameworks" really needed ?
- 7 Use "Source to Source translation" instead of "cross compilation"?
- 8 Which application is using it?
- 9 Surely there must be some criticism
Why this page is merged
188.8.131.52 22:51, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Why this page is merged with Google Code? I tried to add more information, but is removed...
- Because it is part of the Google Code platform. Because of the individual minor articles for each Code service, it is much more efficient to mention them in a unifying article. --Mambo Jambo 00:54, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Done. --184.108.40.206 20:44, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
The CRITICISM section needs to be rewritten in English
-> "compiler result" is a general term with no special public meaning. There is no need to quote it any more than any other two words in the language.
-> This sentence has at least one if not two instances of a run on sentence. Its hard to tell if anything is being said. What is "...thought of rather as an API than as a 'compiler result' supposed to mean?" What is "...handcoded from before..." referring to? Is this some project the author was working on? At the very least, it should be reworked into multiple sentences.
The criticism section is incorrect
Given that the remainder of the criticism is based on this misinformation, it seems like the whole section should be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 17:50, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
GWT is not a software development framework
"One of the more difficult aspects of using the Google Web Toolkit for enterprise development is its lack of a framework. This is by design: GWT is a toolkit, not a framework. It doesn’t tie you into a single approach or methodology, it lets you use any you like."  18.104.22.168 (talk) 07:20, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
GWT implemets Synchronized call
My project need synchronized call remote service in GWT.But I don't know how to implement it.Please help me.In our project, we must wait the service return the result and dependence on the result to choose which way go to.In this case we must use synchronized. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 03:19, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
does "Other Frameworks" really needed ?
Use "Source to Source translation" instead of "cross compilation"?
I read this in the cross compiler article: "Not targeted by this definition are source to source translators, which are often mistakenly called cross compilers.". Is this the case in this article perhaps? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 14:56, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Which application is using it?
Surely there must be some criticism
So the old "criticism" section that apparently existed here at one time was bad and got deleted. Surely there must still be some criticism, of the approach (treating a Web browser as if it were nothing more than a window system running on a weird virtual machine, breaking the ability to save, link, share, etc., the rendered document) -- although many of those criticisms are properly general criticisms of the programming model this thing implies, which doesn't seem to have a name. 121a0012 (talk) 05:45, 23 February 2012 (UTC)