Talk:Green Cape Lighthouse

Australia: New South Wales / Maritime Low‑importance

	Australia portal Green Cape Lighthouse is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian maritime history (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Lighthouses Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lighthouses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lighthouses and other water navigational aids on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LighthousesWikipedia:WikiProject LighthousesTemplate:WikiProject LighthousesLighthouses articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Two articles?[edit]

Given there are two lighthouses and two infoboxes, should we have two articles (obviously cross-linked)? It seems a bit messy to have them in a single article, particularly as the most dominant element in the photo of the modern lighthouse is the historic lighthouse. Kerry (talk) 06:57, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kerry Raymond: I believe it is customary not to create a separate article for a new light at the same location, especially not when the light name is the same and all the data we have for the new light is light details. If you want to discuss this practice, I believe the project is the place to start. --Muhandes (talk) 07:35, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is standard to include the reasons for heritage listing, so let's restore that and move on. Kerry (talk) 08:50, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to leave it as one then; I'll re-instate the standard heritage criteria. Kerry (talk) 09:09, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kerry Raymond: It's one thing to add a section with heritage criteria and I'm all for that, see for example how it was done in Point Stephens Light. It's another thing to copy-pasta the entire entry. Add to that the fact that the text is mostly a template, copied from one listing to another, and I fail to see how this is encyclopedic. However, I am not going to argue, let the copy-pasters have their fun and I will move elsewhere. --Muhandes (talk) 13:32, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have embedded the two infoboxes. Hope that looks okay! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:30, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]