Talk:Greening Earth Society

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Climate change Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Untitled[edit]

This article's point is purely rather humdrum (somewhat fearful?) and inaccurate ad-hominem rather than content related to the topic. For instance engaging half a braincell and looking at any chart can show you that the ridiculous argument in the rider without supporting link or quite :

"Although the Greening Earth Society is generally skeptical of climate change, it appears to endorse some degree of global warming as real: "Fact #1. The rate of global warming during the past several decades has been about 0.18ºC per decade". [6] However, this statement understates actual warming by a factor of about two, according to a report in the Journal of Climate which claims Earth has been warming at 0.25 °C per decade since 1979.[7]"

Temperature change is not linear. Climate change in general is something that happens with or without man and has had dramatic upswing from the period between 1979 and 1997, has remained relatively steady since, as no full timeframe is given for how many decades they're saying then their report is likely accurate, in fact looking at the temperature record for before 79 the temprature was in fact going down and people were worried we were heading into the next ice age. So I'm going to edit this to not be so blatantly biased. Also they are skeptical of man made global climate change, skepticism of climate change would be akin to skepticism of tides, and the lack of clarity in differentiating this description there is obviously used to try and engender this view of these people. —Preceding unsigned comment added by someone (talk • contribs)

Thank you for declaring your biases. Unfortunately you've let them creep into your version. Looking at the revert war [1] I don't think either version is acceptable. 0.25 is not twice 0.18. Nor is "of course" useable wrt the GES views on climate change. Nor is it at all clear what "mass" GW might be William M. Connolley (talk) 08:21, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Greening Earth Society. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:20, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Greening Earth Society. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090422232352/http://archive.salon.com/books/review/2001/07/02/murray/index.html to http://archive.salon.com/books/review/2001/07/02/murray/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:10, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]