|This page was nominated for deletion on 27 October 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to Pivotal Greenplum Database.|
|This page was nominated for deletion on 23 March 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.|
This is an ad not an article! Delete it.
Note that at least one sentence in this article, talking about "MPP" and "BI," appears to be directly lifted (or "copied") from Greenplum's own web site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 18:00, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Agreed--the fact that this company is represented in such an offensively biased way on Wikipedia does not speak well of the company itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 19:05, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Greenplum (the company) and Greenplum (the software)
Should details of Greenplum (the software) be separated from this article as this article is mainly for Greenplum (the company)?
- I'd say the main problem is the vast amount of substandard sources: The company's own websites, press releases, blogs and the like. If all those sources were weeded out, and the content currently based on them removed, I'd expect many of the details on the software will be gone as well. I rather doubt both software and company are independently notable, so having a single article on both (if at all) seems the way to go. Huon (talk) 19:29, 30 October 2014 (UTC)