|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
GA |
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Low |
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
|
I read the reason for the name change, but it was still not sound enough. Consistency in episode titles doesn't mean anything — there's no article on Wikipedia named "Greg Pikitis" or anything similar to it, so "(Parks and Recreation)" is useless. Not all articles have this after their name, only is an article with the same or similar name already exists. These are, I believe, the standard rules of WP:TVMOS and WP:NAME. I will not move it back now, but would like to see some comment as to why the page was moved in the first place. The Flash {talk} 21:26, 11 November 2009 (UTC) {{
[edit] GA Review
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Greg Pikitis/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 23:13, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi, well I've copy edited the article and changed what I thought needed to be changed. The article is fine to me and I would like to pass it as a Good article. Xtzou (Talk) 23:13, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- So, hearing no objections, I will go ahead and do it. I am always impressed when I can follow the plot! And this article has everything else in order, also.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:

- B. MoS compliance:

- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:

- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

- C. No original research:

- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:

- B. Focused:

- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:

- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:

- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Pass!

Congratulations! A good article. Xtzou (Talk) 23:35, 13 April 2010 (UTC)