Talk:Grifols

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article needs to hold a section regarding the polemic around Grifols company philosophy in Spain. Reciently Grifols, like DKMS, wants to break the currunt system of altruistic blood donation in Spain. --Orissos (talk) 12:12, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grifols. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:07, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Romanian immunoglobin supply collusion" needs editing[edit]

(Full disclosure: I'm a Grifols employee, so probably shouldn't be the person making the edit - even to correct the factual errors here.) For this section, I suggest using https://www.romania-insider.com/romania-competition-council-fine-pharma as the source - unlike the existing source, this one actually lists what companies were investigated. The article currently says that "the company" (meaning Grifols) was sanctioned. This isn't quite accurate; the company that was sanctioned was Biotest, the actions they were sanctioned for took place in 2015-2018, they were fined in February 2022, and Biotest wasn't acquired by Grifols until April 2022 (source: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/grifols-completes-the-acquisition-of-biotest-a-strategic-and-transformational-transaction-to-accelerate-growth-and-innovation-301531829.html). So while it's quite fair to list this on the Grifols page, as Biotest is now owned by Grifols, the actions and fine took place before the acquisition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.63.76.98 (talk) 14:46, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Catalan-speaking countries,[edit]

So it is propaganda. :( Nothing regarding the Gotham report?. Shame 113.255.173.23 (talk) 17:15, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]