Talk:Guesstimate

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Guesstimate is not a word and should not be used.....EVER! For those people who do use it, all I have to say is "you're much more intelligent than myself".

I actully like the word! I think that it should a word that people should use freely. By Alec1990 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.6.199.112 (talk) 21:50, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Harvey[edit]

Fox News claims that Paul Harvey invented the word. (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,502645,00.html) -70.251.93.156 (talk) 17:29, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Time magazine would dispute this. Cinemaddict for example was another of their portmonteaux from the 1920s and 30s. Cannot find the name of the book that contains this gem but if I do I could be back 86.45.62.58 (talk) 17:29, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nina Munk Fools Rush In : Steve Case, Jerry Levin, and the Unmaking of AOL Time Warner is that book 86.45.62.58 (talk) 20:08, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ugggh[edit]

It's actually a hideous word (192.122.220.243 (talk) 12:58, 25 May 2009 (UTC))[reply]

What's the difference between guesstimate and guess?[edit]

Not explained. 90.211.194.155 (talk) 16:04, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guesstimate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:13, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]