Talk:HMS Good Hope (1901)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Ships (Rated GA-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. WikiProject icon
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject Military history (Rated GA-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality assessment scale.
WikiProject Shipwrecks (Rated GA-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Good Hope (1901)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 04:21, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

(a) the prose is clear and concise, it respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct
(b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
(b) all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines
(c) it contains no original research
(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
(a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content
(b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

After reading through the article and making minor adjustments where it seemed needed, I feel this article is good to go. Congratulations! As you’ll see, I’ve added some shortening to my sig! (talk) 00:37, 12 March 2014 (UTC)