What's missing from the page is a brief description of what these mean. Why are the these results interesting?
A terrible analogy!
> This would be like taking a fair coin that is showing heads, flipping it twice, and it always landing on heads after the second flip.
This is a terrible analogy! Flipping a coin implies observation of the result. Had we used Hadamard transform for flipping a coin, the subsequent flips would not be any different. Quantum effects should never be explained using classical analogies! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kallikanzarid (talk • contribs) 11:44, 16 September 2012 (UTC)