Talk:Haibutsu kishaku

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Japan / History / Religion (Rated B-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 17:38, April 21, 2014 (JST, Heisei 26) (Refresh)
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by the History task force.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by the Religion task force.
 
WikiProject Buddhism (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. Please participate by editing the article Haibutsu kishaku, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Urashimataro (talk) 23:52, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Upgraded to Mid importance[edit]

The Haibutsu kishaku of the Meiji era was a catastrophic event and, together with the shinbutsu bunri, a turning point in the history of Japan and Buddhism. Like it, it is IMHO of at least mid importance, if not higher. You can't understand religion in Japan today without these two articles. urashimataro (talk) 04:14, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

I agree, so I went ahead and upgraded it to high importance. The event is not well known, even among Japanophiles, but that surely doesn't lessen the significance of the event. Boneyard90 (talk) 08:00, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

References[edit]

Wikipedia as reference for a wikipedia article is not a good idea...bamse (talk) 23:24, 5 December 2009 (UTC)