Talk:Hair follicle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Medicine / Dermatology  (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that this article follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Dermatology task force.
 

The image used here was a copyvio from http://www.follicle.com/1.html. - Texture 19:00, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)

As articles about other animals refer to hair follicles, some effort should be made to discuss these systems in other animals (mammals, insects, etc.) if they are different there. Vivacissamamente 13:58, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

Can we get photos of real hairs and diagrams of the different stages, like [1]? — Omegatron 04:07, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

What is club hair? 82.139.85.220 (talk) 12:07, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Mention Follicular bundles? Had a scalp treatment yesterday, they used a camera to look at my scalp and I was surprised to see 1, 2 or three hairs from each pore. I've look for some time for information of this and found only one reference to it. It seems it is common while all pictures show one hair emerging and no other site mention this. Gwen4598 (talk) 14:50, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

DNA testing of hair[edit]

CSI (forget which particular series) suggests that only a specific part of the hair (guessing sheath near root) contains testable genetic material. Is there any factual basis? — Nahum Reduta [talk|contribs] 09:09, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

No. Until a year or two ago, current technology only allowed DNA to be harvested from the sheath near the root. That doesn't mean that there isn't DNA in the hair strand itself, just that that particular technology couldn't harvest it from the strand. New breakthroughs allow DNA to be harvested from hair strands. CSI is a really, really bad place to get your science from. --NellieBly (talk) 01:21, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Wonderful reference article to add[edit]

  • First, there is a wonderful NEJM article that I referenced a few times in this article, and I think if someone has more time, more content could be cited from it. The article is: Paus, Ralf; Cotsarelis, George. "The Biology of Hair Follicles." The New England Journal of Medicine. 1999; 341(7): 491-497. PMID 10441606. I can email it to you if you contact me.
  • Second, if you are interested in the skin, adnexa, or dermatology, I would love some help over at WP:DERM... just fyi. kilbad (talk) 05:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Hair growth cycle times[edit]

Can someone add more? Is this possible? It would be good for the readers to know the average phase or time of hair growth in other parts of the body. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Talaga87 (talkcontribs) 07:28, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Image:Skin.jpg[edit]

Hello!

This bot has detected that this page contains an image, Image:Skin.jpg, in a raster format. A replacement is available as a Scalable vector graphic (SVG) at File:Skin.svg. If the replacement image is suitable please edit the article to use the vector version. Scalable vector graphics should be used in preference to raster for images that can easily represented in a vector graphic format. If this bot is in error, you may leave a bug report at its talk page Thanks SVnaGBot1 (talk) 09:58, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Club Hair[edit]

The link to define "club hair" is external. The guidelines state that an article should be understandable without having to leave the site (paraphrased). I can understand the general idea of the article, but to say that the hair is converted to a club hair, without us knowing what a club hair is, leaves a hole in that understanding, and, I think, indicates one in this article. Lriley47 (talk) 16:41, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Feathers[edit]

I was reading about birds (great article by the way!) and when I got to the part about feather follicles, I went What's That? So I clicked on the link and here it is talking about hair and not a feather in sight!

I'm thinking we should create a new section.

Rubypc123 (talk) 03:11, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessaryily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.healthyhairhighlights.com/stress-and-hair-loss.html
    Triggered by \bhealthyhairhighlights\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 15:53, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 20:07, 25 December 2013 (UTC)