This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Page moved to Harbourfront Centre; this is the primary topic as explained by Takinson, and there have been no reasoned arguments against that. Ucucha 16:06, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
Harbourfront Centre in Toronto should be moved back to this page. It does not make sense to compare an international cultural center with 12 million visitors a year with a shopping mall. Because HarbourFront Centre in Singapore has a capital F, it could be easily distinguished. There could still be a disambiguation page which lists both locations from the top of the Harbourfront Centre page. Takinson (talk) 17:04, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
I'm not weighing in on the merits of the move but, if it's made, a disambiguation poage is not necessary. A dab hatnote is all that's needed per WP:DAB. — AjaxSmack 01:50, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Comment a dab page is still needed, at the wrong spelling, Harborfront Center, so maybe just move the dab page there? Since that's the American Spelling, and you can't tell which someone from the US might want. 184.108.40.206 (talk) 03:50, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
I see nothing wrong with the current setup, except the naming of this page (which I am about to move to Harbourfront Centre (Toronto)) - I don't think the average reader sees a huge difference between Harbourfront Centre and HarbourFront Centre, so the dab is useful. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:25, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
With all due respect, I do see a problem with the current setup. Based on Wikipedia rules on disambiguation, in case of two articles with the same name, a primary topic could be identified. Both the page visit numbers and number of pages linking to Harbourfront Centre (Toronto) are far higher in numbers than the shopping mall in Singapore. Also, as I said before, the prominence of Harbourfront Centre, based on facts, numbers and common sense, far exceeds that of the Singapore mall. On this ground, I am requesting to make Harbourfront Centre (Toronto) the primary topic and moving it to Harbourfront Centre and having a hatnote linking to Harbourfront Centre (Singapore). In this case, no disambiguation page is required as there are only two Harbourfront Centres on Wikipedia and there is a need for such a page only if there are 3 or more articles of the same name. Please visit the help section of Wikipedia on disambiguation for more clarification of my point in this discussion. Thanks. (Takinson (talk) 17:20, 10 May 2010 (UTC))
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Harbourfront Centre which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 06:30, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Is it necessary to have the Wireless Toronto Advertisement? If the location has Wi-Fi saying it has wifi should do. Harbourfront Centre can surely say who provides their wifi on their own homepage.Woods01 (talk) 07:32, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
I don't think it needs to be mentioned at all. Removed. Canterbury Tailtalk 11:32, 8 August 2010 (UTC)