Talk:Hartley (unit)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Measurement, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.MeasurementWikipedia:WikiProject MeasurementTemplate:WikiProject MeasurementMeasurement articles

Computing: CompSci Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Mid-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Suggested merge into Ban (unit)[edit]

It has been suggested to merge this into the article Ban (unit). I completely disagree because the international standard name for this unit is hartley, not ban. I would support the opposite merge (of ban into hartley). Dondervogel 2 (talk) 23:08, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with merging Ban (unit) into Hartley (unit). The SI unit is both more official and more well known. Dicklyon (talk) 23:13, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge of Hartly (unit) into Ban (unit). Support merge in the opposite direction (i.e. I agree with both Dondervogel and Dicklyon above). A minor point: hartley does not appear to be an SI unit, but it is unit specified by the International System of Quantities. It also appears to have superseded the ban as a name for the same unit, the ban having been an early suggestion. —Quondum 13:36, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since we all agree, I hope someone will just do it. Dicklyon (talk) 18:16, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Olexa Riznyk (talk) 20:02, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First use of "hartley" and "dit"?[edit]

The article already discusses the origin of the term "ban" (Turing/Good in 1940), but not the origin of the terms "hartley" (probably coined not before Hartley's death in 1970) and "dit" (probably coined not before 1947/1948 when Tukey/Shannon used the term bit). So far, the oldest source given for "dit" is from 1970, but this certainly isn't the earliest usage of the term. So, if you find "hartley" or "dit" being mentioned in old sources, please add them to the article. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 21:22, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]