Talk:Hazard analysis and critical control points

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Food and drink / Foodservice (Rated C-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Old discussions[edit]

I agree with Rcharman's comment below. The HACCP graphic does not accurately represent the seven principles, in my opinion. I have a HACCP certification so I consider myself qualified to make that call. I'm going to design a better graphic based on the FSIS/USDA Rule. --FakeSinatra 16:53, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

For having seven principles, why does the HACCP graphic only show six sections? Rcharman 13:08, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

It seems to me like there should be section on criticisms of the system, safety gaps etc. 10:27, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Still, they are basically catching up to a year old system, but they still have a lot of work to do to become competitive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 18:51, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

HACCP versus ISO 22000 inconsistency[edit]

We can't say both "ISO 22000 is the new standard bound to replace HACCP" and in the next paragraph "ISO 22000 will not replace HACCP". Someone who knows what the real deal is, please correct this (I'm not qualified myself I'm afraid). — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 06:42, 12 September 2012 (UTC)