Talk:He Yingqin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Biography / Military / Politics and Government (Rated B-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the military biography work group.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group.
 

This article has comments here.

WikiProject China (Rated B-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

This article has comments here.

WikiProject Military history (Rated C-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
C This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality assessment scale.
This article has an assessment summary page.



Romanisation[edit]

I removed the Wade Giles romanisation for this guy[1] because he is not widely known under WG romanisation (i.e. unlike, say, Chiang Kai-shek) 199.111.230.195 19:07, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Assessment[edit]

Needs references. I shouldn't even be ranking this at B without references. But it does appear to be long, thorough and detailed, and hopefully accurate. Thanks for some good work. LordAmeth 10:49, 14 October 2006 (UTC)