To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: | B1 <!-- Referencing and citations --> = y/n | B2 <!-- Coverage and accuracy --> = y/n | B3 <!-- Structure --> = y/n | B4 <!-- Grammar and style --> = y/n | B5 <!-- Supporting materials --> = y/n
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
Deleted misleading un-sourced reference to Stirner in opening para. Why? Woodcock, for example, states: 'Thus Max Stirner's egoism is rejected by Read in favour of the anarchist-communism of Kropotkin, or at least of his own adaptation of that doctrine.' (Herbert Read: The Stream and the Source, London: Faber & Faber, 1972, p. 223.) Wingspeed (talk) 14:22, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
I don't think the information recently appended concerning Frank McEwen really tells us anything substantial about Herbert Read. I would suggest this remark should be deleted. --Antisyzygy 15:25, 2 December 2006 (UTC)o