Talk:Higashiyama period

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Japan / Culture / History (Rated Start-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 02:33, October 7, 2014 (JST, Heisei 26) (Refresh)
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by the Culture task force.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by the History task force.
 

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was moved already Patstuarttalk|edits 05:22, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Higashiyama BunkaHigashiyama CultureWikipedia:Use English Kusunose 02:59, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Survey[edit]

Add  # '''Support'''  or  # '''Oppose'''  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

Survey - Support votes[edit]

Survey - Oppose votes[edit]

Discussion[edit]

Add any additional comments:

Is there any reason to use Culture with a capital C here? Dekimasu 15:14, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

The way I see it, "Higashiyama Bunka" is a proper noun. Even if we do translate it and go for "Higashiyama Culture" (and, please god, I hope no one suggests "Eastern Mountain Culture"), I still think it's a proper noun, referring the particular culture of that time and place, and not any culture that could happen in/on any Higashiyama at any time. LordAmeth 20:41, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

I think "Higashiyama period" might be better given Jomon period, etc. Since it was a period in the 15th century, and the article even refers to it as a period, I believe this makes the most sense and is consistent with Template:History of Japan listings. It may even be a good addition to the template. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 20:49, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Alright. That sounds good to me. LordAmeth 21:17, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Well, I was just bold and moved it for the reasons given above. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 07:19, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.