Talk:History of Andhra Pradesh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject India / History (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (marked as Mid-importance).
 
WikiProject History (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

Editing[edit]

The editing process is on which may take considerable time. Inputs are welcome.Kumarrao 11:20, 2 July 2007 (UTC)


Be brief[edit]

Please keep the sections brief and create links to detailed and separate articles.Kumarrao (talk) 13:44, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Editing[edit]

I deleted the duplicated information and started writing from 'Introduction'.Kumarrao (talk) 07:25, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Wallace McDonald (talk) 02:49, 22 July 2014 (UTC)I went through the entire article to correct the English. In some places it was good, but in other places needed considerable work. I am NOT an authority on Indian history, and I may have misunderstood some passages. The article definitely still needs going over by someone who does know the subject well.

The last few paragraphs, about the reorganization of states on linguistic lines, are much less coherent than the others and seem to include some distinctly partisan material. The last paragraph is very badly written, and I was unable to clear it up entirely.

Undue importance to 'Musunuri Nayakas' section[edit]

I'm surprised to note that the Musunuri Nayakas section is larger than Vijayanagara Empire section or Kakatiya Section. Even Primary school children would concur that Kakatiyas and Vijayanagara Empire were the most important periods of our history. Also I notice a lot of peacock terms in Musunuri Nayakas section, which leads me to suspect bias in the editor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.162.23.4 (talk) 04:45, 11 September 2011 (UTC)