Talk:History of Zagreb
| WikiProject Croatia / Zagreb | (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance) | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
"It would be much easier, therefore, to take a short walk and look at Zagreb's history." this doesn't strike me as proper formating for a wiki article... but its not a big error, and the article seems well written in the formats it was written in(the citations don't look like enough thourough enough though). just thought i'd put the idea out there.--193.235.215.105 16:52, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Historical periods
I agree that the article is more "popular scientific" in its tone, but my main concern is that it doesn't follow the good practice of being divided into the actual historical periods. I'm not a historian myself, but it should really mention the Roman period (the town of Andautonia was on the edge of modern city area), detailed history of the medieval times etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BerislavLopac (talk • contribs) 07:58, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
