Talk:History of the administrative division of Russia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Russia / History / Human geography (Rated Start-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia.
To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the human geography of Russia task force.
 

Old talk[edit]

Interesting, can we have a contuniation of this article? There is still half of 18th and entire 19th and 20th centuries missing...-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  22:12, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, that was the plan all along, until my hard drive crashed, taking irreplaceable scans of several 18th and 19th century books, which I was using as sources, with it :( The project stopped being fun right after that had happened.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:43, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Inspiration from Sweden[edit]

He started to reform the public administration along swedish pattern with civil service departments, central administrative boards and division of counties. Can anyone get this into the text? --212.247.27.32 21:29, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Got any refrences?

-G

Merger proposals[edit]

For the record (and since there is nothing here so far anyway), I oppose the proposed merger of year-by-year articles into this one. The resulting article would be unwieldy, and the period-specific lists are far from being complete at any rate.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); May 4, 2011; 14:41 (UTC)

  • I'd also like to oppose this merger. The result would, in my opinion, be difficult to navigate comfortably due to size, especially if the articles-to-be-merged aren't even complete.--Slon02 (talk) 23:17, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
    Closed as opposed, there will be no merger.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:53, 28 November 2011 (UTC)