Talk:Hollywood/Highland station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image Consensus is Here (Everyone is Invited to partake)[edit]

There has been severe controversies with image selections in the Red Line/Purple Line and Gold Line section of the Los Angeles Metro. To cease the controversy in a fair and a peaceful way, it has been decided of a referendum to take place starting from Monday, March 2, 2015. Please participate!
Click here.
HanSangYoon (talk) 19:14, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Picture dispute[edit]

I think that the pictures in diff A are better, because they show more detail of the stations. HSY thinks that diff B is better, because those pictures are more efficient. Could some other people chime in so we can form a consensus here? Thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 02:03, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There should be no dispute when someone is willing to take pictures which overall improve many of these Los Angeles stations. Were you aware that there was an earlier dispute over picture source and quality? Are you willing to take on that camera work as a project? I believe the idea is to have a good picture of the platform in the Infobox, if one is available, and use others to appropriately enhance the content of the article. Secondarywaltz (talk) 02:48, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What I like about the infobox picture in diff A is that it shows not only the platform, but the architectural details above it. The diff B picture only hints at the upper details. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 02:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn. I'll leave you kids to squabble about this. Secondarywaltz (talk) 05:12, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hollywood/Highland station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:28, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]