Talk:Homi K. Bhabha

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Criticisms[edit]

To whoever is trying to add a disproportionate amount of criticisms of Bhabha: please go by the guidelines laid out in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:BLP. More specifically, see:

Editors should remove any controversial material about living persons that is either unsourced, relies upon sources that do not meet standards specified in Wikipedia:Reliable sources, or is a conjectural interpretation of a source. In cases where the information is derogatory and poorly sourced or unsourced, this kind of edit is an exception to the three-revert rule. These principles apply to biographical material about living persons found anywhere in Wikipedia, including user and talk pages. Administrators may enforce the removal of such material with page protection and blocks, even if they have been editing the article themselves. Editors who re-insert the material may be warned and blocked. See the blocking policy and Wikipedia:Libel.
Any assertion in a biography of a living person that might be defamatory if untrue must be sourced. Without reliable third-party sources, a biography will violate No original research and Verifiability, and could lead to libel claims. Information available solely on partisan websites or in obscure newspapers should be handled with caution, and, if derogatory, should not be used at all. Information found in self-published books, newspapers, or websites/blogs should never be used, unless written by the subject (see below). Not all widely read newspapers and magazines are equally reliable. There are some magazines and newspapers that print gossip much of which is false. While such information may be titillating, that does not mean it has a place here. Before repeating such gossip, ask yourself if the information is presented as being true, if the source is reliable, and if the information, even if true, is relevant to an encyclopaedic article on that subject. When these magazines print information they suspect is untrue, they often include weasel phrases. Look out for these. If the magazine doesn't think the story is true, then why should we?
Editors should be on the lookout for biased or malicious content in biographies or biographical information. If someone appears to be pushing an agenda or a biased point of view, insist on reliable third-party published sources and a clear demonstration of relevance to the person's notability. The views of critics should be represented if their views are relevant to the subject's notability and are based on reliable sources, and so long as the material is written in a manner that does not overwhelm the article or appear to side with the critics' material. Be careful not to give a disproportionate amount of space to critics, to avoid the effect of representing a minority view as if it were the majority one. If the criticism represents the views of a tiny minority, it has no place in the article. Content should be sourced to reliable sources and should be about the subject of the article specifically. Beware of positive or negative claims that rely on association.

Thank you. Hay4 18:12, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what the page was like before, but it now conforms to these principles, though I would be interested if a (cited/sourced) criticism of Bhabha's central theme could be added to position the debate a little more, especially if there is a counter response. Paul haynes 14:16, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On a purely stylistic note, shouldn't Bhabha's response to criticisms be a subheading to the Criticisms of Bhabha's work section, rather than a section of its own? It seems odd to have two sections with one subsection each, and preferable to have one section with two related subsections.Cnilep (talk) 21:45, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

K.?[edit]

Could someone please insert what the 'K.' in his name stands for? -- Fullstop 07:32, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Books/articles list corrected[edit]

Identity: The Real Me removed from list of books edited by Bhabha. It was edited by Lisa Appignanesi, published 1987 by the Institute of Contemporary Arts, London. Entry from Bodleian catalogue: Title Identity: the real me / [editor, Lisa Appignansi] Publisher London : Institute of Contemporary Arts, c1987 Description 48 p. : ill., ports ; 30 cm Series ICA documents ; 6 Notes Includes bibliographies ISBN 0905263464 Subjects Identity (Philosophical concept) Other Names Appignanesi, Lisa. Institute of Contemporary Arts (London, England) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.5.38 (talk) 17:20, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • (2004) The Third World of Theory with Henry Louis Gates Removed. This seems to be a phantom book of Henry Louis Gates which was never published (no copies are listed in WorldCat). The inclusion of Bhabha's name was an error on Amazon.com.

Notable Ideas[edit]

Says who? Where? Note also that something enunciatory won Bhabha the second-place prize in the Bad Writing Contest of 1998. rudra (talk) 10:16, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bad Writing award has been included. When I find time, I would like to expand more on his ideas. For the person who keeps removing the criticism from the lead, here is the place to explain/justify that. —Zujine|talk 15:37, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added come key concepts of his from his book Location of Culture including ambivalence, cultural difference, mimicry, and Third space. Possibly link the hybridity section to the post-colonial subheading of the hybridity page? Time-lag and his discussion on modernity could be added.Dvo19 (talk) 23:00, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zoroastrianism[edit]

That he is (said to come) from a Parsi family is a mildly interesting fact, but isn't the label "Parsi people" (let alone the links to "Project Zoroastrianism") over the top? Feketekave (talk) 01:56, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Homi K. Bhabha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:38, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Homi K. Bhabha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:52, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Homi_K._Bhabha&oldid=1206280779"