Talk:Legend (TV channel)

Television: British / Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neutral Point of View[edit]

this seems like an advertisement from the company to me --Farrtj 17:03, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, please can you sign your comments with --~~~~ after your comment in the future, so people know who said what. I added it to your comment now anyway. As for your comment, yes I agree with you. it does read terribly as an advertisement. Either the article will have to be rewritten from scratch or deleted. I'll check the advice on Wikipedia before acting. --Sonic 14:18, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, the article fails Wikipedia:Notability (companies and corporations) in terms of and I quote "Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. The published works must be someone else writing about the company, corporation, product, or service." and section 1.4.3 of Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Rather than delete the article, I will try and see if the article can be rewritten in some way. --Sonic 14:26, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I rewrote the whole article. Hopefully it should now be encyclopedic. --Sonic 15:37, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Horror ChanUK.GIF[edit]

Image:Horror ChanUK.GIF is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 22:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.r-m-t.co.uk/news/more01.php?id=27
Triggered by \bt\.co\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 17:58, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 16:05, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 11:23, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Horror Channel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:44, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Zone Fantasy which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:16, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Horror Channel rebrands to HorrorXtra[edit]

Horror Channel rebranded as HorrorXtra. A new redirect to a new page is needed to reflect the changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Csctv (talk • contribs) 10:16, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

what if LEGEND+1[edit]

the timeshift logo on logopedia fandom I saw horror+1 I didn't watch horror channel I watched LEGEND 82.9.205.226 (talk) 16:12, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

really I'm bit too confused it's because of horror+1 did it got rid of timeshift during LEGEND or not 82.9.205.226 (talk) 16:16, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]