Talk:Hugh Latimer

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Christianity: Saints / Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Saints portal This article is supported by WikiProject Saints (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Mid-importance).

Christ's second[edit]

Is "Latimer's belief in Christ's return" really remarkable enough for a special section, given that it's a basic doctrine held by the vast majority of Christians? It's like having a section called "Latimer's belief in God". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.8.98 (talk) 17:23, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hugh Latimer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060812030822/http://www.ely.anglican.org/about/good_and_great/hlatimer.html to http://www.ely.anglican.org/about/good_and_great/hlatimer.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:52, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fahrenheit 451[edit]

Would it be appropriate to mention that the quote "Play the man, Master Ridley" is in Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury? If so, could it be added here? I don't have time to do it myself, but if someone else did, that would be okay. 216.252.2.78 (talk) 23:16, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would probably be out of place here. However, it may be useful to add it to Fahrenheit 451 or to Ray Bradbury, particularly if we can find a reliable source to clarify what Bradbury meant by the allusion. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:30, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Prolocutor's response needs explanation[edit]

This needs to be explained in modern language:

"After the sentence had been pronounced, Latimer added, 'I thank God most heartily that He hath prolonged my life to this end, that I may in this case glorify God by that kind of death'; to which the prolocutor replied, 'If you go to heaven in this faith, then I will never come hither, as I am thus persuaded.'"

Is the "prolocuter" Latimer's prosecutor (as the anecdote might imply - "if you go to heaven, then I won't, as our views are opposite"), or his advocate (as the word "prolocuter" implies)?