Talk:Hundred Schools of Thought

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject China (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Chinese history workgroup (marked as Mid-importance).
 
WikiProject Philosophy (Rated Start-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
 Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Contents

[edit] Public domain?

Parts of this article came from "the U.S. Library of Congress, Country Studies/Area Handbook" [1]. Is the material really in public domain? - Mandel - May 8, 2004

[edit] Copy editing

Improvements to the English have been made by many contributors. I do not see anything wrong with the English now. Ought not the administrators remove this article from the "need copy-editing" category? PM Poon 08:51, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

I'm doing a bit more tidying & copy-editing, then I'll remove the notice (but it doesn't take an admin to do it). --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 16:15, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Thomas Hobbes

When reading about Xun Zi did anyone think about Thomas Hobbes?

[edit] "Other Schools" ironic

Naming things in this way makes the same seem as though it were different.

[edit] Addition of unreferenced information

I see that this article continues to be used as a dumping ground for unreferenced material. I think it's time we start pruning and weeding. Viriditas (talk) 23:38, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

I'm glad to see that you are volunteering to read through all the books & papers on the topic, to really improve the article and not just delete material. So few are willing! --Gwern (contribs) 16:13 28 September 2010 (GMT)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export