Talk:Hurricane Ingrid

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHurricane Ingrid has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starHurricane Ingrid is part of the 2013 Atlantic hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 5, 2014Good article nomineeListed
June 17, 2014Good topic candidatePromoted
In the newsA news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on September 17, 2013.
Current status: Good article

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain t/c 17:45, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Hurricane Ingrid (2013)Hurricane Ingrid – There aren't other hurricanes with this name. It is the first time I request a cyclone to be moved so I don't know if WP:G6 applies as Hurricane Ingrid redirects to 2013 Atlantic hurricane season#Hurricane Ingrid, which is about this hurricane. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 16:39, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy move It looks like whoever created this article just didn't overwrite the redirect. --BDD (talk) 23:48, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep it as Hurricane Ingrid (2013) per YE.--12george1 (talk) 03:14, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Still support as proposed. There's only one hurricane by this name, and the other storm doesn't even have a standalone article. Use a hatnote to deal with any potential confusion. --BDD (talk) 22:53, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Ingrid/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 20:50, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hurricanehink, I am going to review this article and will hopefully finish sometimes today. Overall, nice job!--12george1 (talk) 20:50, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • " It formed on September 12 in the Gulf of Mexico from a broad disturbance that also spawned Manuel on the Pacific coast." - Since you mention the Gulf of Mexico and "Pacific coast", you could also be referring to the United States. :P
  • "Subsequently, increased wind shear weakened the convection as" - Wikilink wind shear and convection
  • "Ingrid made landfall just south of" - Wikilink landfall
  • "Rainfall from the storm peaked at 20.11 in (511 mm) in Tuxpan, Veracruz." - If you are using metric first throughout the rest of the article, then it should be inches converted to millimeters. Ditto for the other rainfall totals.
  • I see that you spelled out National Hurricane Center earlier in the article.--12george1 (talk) 03:00, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • "making it the first time since 1958 that tropical cyclones struck both coasts of the country within one day.[13]" - Can you state the names of those storms? Apparently they were Tropical Storm Alma and Tropical Storm Two.
  • This wasn't done because sources could not verify it was these two tropical cyclones.--12george1 (talk) 03:00, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is inconsistency with the authors names in the references. For examples, reference #3 says "Aliva/Brennan", while reference #12 has " Richard J. Pasch; David A. Zelinsky".
  • Remember to use (in Spanish) for all of the Spanish sources.
  • The last name of the author for reference #1 is misspelled.
  • Reference #32 is a deadlink. No surprise there. :P Btw, the urls for the Storm Data publications die after only 24 hours now.
  • That should be everything. Again, nice work and good luck in the WikiCup. Regards, --12george1 (talk) 20:50, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good job, Hurricaneihink! :) I will now pass this article and list it as a Good Article. Regards, --12george1 (talk) 03:00, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]