This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hello, and come what may from this review, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. During the review, I may make copyedits, which I will limit to spelling correction and minor changes to punctuation (removal of double spaces and such). I will only make substantive edits that change the flow and structure of the prose if I previously suggested and it is necessary. The Nominator(s) should understand that I am a grammar pedant, and I will nitpick in the interest of prose quality. For responding to my comments, please use Done, Fixed, Added, Not done, Doing..., or Removed, followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine. A detailed, section-by-section review will follow. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 02:18, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Vami IV! I think I've responded to all of your points, let me know if there's anything unresolved Eddie891TalkWork 12:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The line in Footnote A, the shovel'd clods that fill the grave, is not used in the version of the poem in the article.
Fixed As it turns out, our poem is incorrect, I've amended based upon the Walt Whitman archive [1], and removed a source for the text altogether (as in plot summaries, the poem's text can source itself, cf. the FA "O Captain! My Captain!"). Teach me to trust what's already in the article! Eddie891TalkWork 12:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There are exactly one instance of shortenings "Hush'd" and "This Dust" each in the article.
Partly done, spelled out "This Dust", Hush'd is used as an abbreviation several times Eddie891TalkWork 12:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Done, 
Fixed, 
Added, 
Not done, 
Doing..., or 
Removed, followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine. A detailed, section-by-section review will follow. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 02:18, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Fixed As it turns out, our poem is incorrect, I've amended based upon the Walt Whitman archive [1], and removed a source for the text altogether (as in plot summaries, the poem's text can source itself, cf. the FA "O Captain! My Captain!"). Teach me to trust what's already in the article! Eddie891 Talk Work 12:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
