 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Dentistry. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the project or you can direct questions about the rating system here. |
|
C |
This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
C |
This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Low |
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
 |
Hydroxylapatite is part of WikiProject Rocks and minerals, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use rocks and minerals resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information. |
|
C |
This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
the international association of mineralogy strongly recommends the word hydroxylapatite rather than hydroxyapatite. I suggest this article is renamed to hydroxylapatite.
Bedrupsbaneman 16:32, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
Should Hydroxyapatite be listed as an alternate name? Is it an older spelling? RJFJR 18:42, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
- I don't know about it being older but the alternate spelling is certainly in use in solid-state chemistry and quite a few of the medical articles I've read also call it Hydroxyapatite. If anyone can get a source for that recommendation then it's worth mentioning in the article IMHO --Edith The Hutt 16:10, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
-
- I think that this is a case of two different sciences using two different names for the same thing. The medical profession seems to se hydroxyapatite. On the other hand the offical name of the mineral is Hydroxylapatite per the dictate of the International Mineralogical Association, the governing body of Mineralogy. Kevmin 04:06, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- I think it is pretentious to use an irregular spelling as the primary spelling for an article on a biomedical material, relying on an international association of mineralogy to set the standard. It is appropriate for them to control the usages of mineralogical names, such as whether a beryllium aluminum garnet should be called beryl, or one with a chromium color center should be called emerald while a similar green with an iron color center is not emerald, but it is not in their purview, with respect to mainstream chemistry to make up new names or spellings. Hydroxyapatite has been the proper spelling in chemical publications for longer than the mineralogy group has been in existence and it is acknowledged the preferred spelling in medical publications, and I would think that teeth had more to do with medical studies than with rocks.173.54.37.223 (talk) 18:44, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- As this article is primarily about the mineral, the accepted mineral name is appropriate. If you want, you could start a medical article or add to the bone mineral stub. Vsmith (talk) 20:32, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Tooth enamel use
The tooth enamel page says it's made of hydroxylapatite. Can someone add to this article why this substance isn't used for dental fillings? It would seem like a natural choice if the substance is identical. (I also asked this over at the dental fillings talk page, and that article would benefit from the answer to this question, if anyone knows.) Tempshill 06:30, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- IIRC it's about 90% hydroxylapatite yes, I'd speculate it's got something to do with the difficulty of forming it and that HAp in tooth enamel has a pretty distinctive microstructure which is very difficult to reproduce. That and maybe the fact you want to replace dentin too, I'm not a dentist or a bio-materials engineer so I couldn't really comment on that aspect. --Edith The Hutt 16:10, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
-
- On usage of hydroxylapatite for small fillings: http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7058
- --Md2perpe 14:07, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Specific gravity imprecision
Hello,
The specific gravity is quoted as 3.08 in the text, but between 3.14 and 3.21 in the cartouche. Which one is right?
24.37.29.254 (talk) 20:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- Provided references give both, but it is more likely the larger value [1]. Lower one (3.08) might be due to porosity. Materialscientist (talk) 22:35, 27 July 2011 (UTC)