Talk:ISO/IEC 27002

Computer Security: Computing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Maint Banner[edit]

No more citiations-needed exist in this stub-page. Can we remove the maint banner across the top, if any second editor would concur, then just remove it. Thanks.Tkukler (talk) 12:58, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

StandardsDirect.org[edit]

I removed the link to a standards purchase site, standardsdirect.org. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam#StandardsDirect.org for more about this site. As I see it, Wikipedia is not a directory and we're not here to help people sell things. Most of these standardsdirect.org links have been added by single purpose accounts who likely have a conflict of interest. See:

If an established, high-volume editor wants to add it back to the article, by all means go ahead. Otherwise, it stays out pending resolution at the spam discussion link above. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:43, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The link to the "ISO 17799 Newsletter" looks like yet another SD link - at least the newsletter promotes SD. NoticeBored (talk) 20:26, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is another direct competitor site to... YOURS (iso27001security.com). You seem to be using linkage (and sometimes even not) to SD, which is only vendor site anyway, to try to clear competitor sites from Wikipedia. Please do NOT use Wikipedia as a competitor market place or for indirect self gain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.231.84 (talk) 09:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

National equivalents[edit]

The table of national equivalent standards is out of date: if nobody is willing to maintain it, maybe the list should omit the years, or provide links to the relevant pages from the national standards bodies in the hope they only offer the current versions? NoticeBored (talk) 20:04, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Misc[edit]

Not sure where to post questions, but isn't there only 11 clauses? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 214.27.58.2 (talk) 00:38, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia isn't a forum. Please address subject questions to the developers of the standard, or to a center of interactive expertise. Sorry. 86.166.156.3 (talk) 09:37, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The comment is a valid point. I checked ISO 27002 standard and found "This standard contains 11 security control clauses [...]". Indeed the mentioned Risk Assessment is a chapter in ISO 27002 but does not belong to the "main security categories". Because of this I suggest to remove it from the given article.