If an established, high-volume editor wants to add it back to the article, by all means go ahead. Otherwise, it stays out pending resolution at the spam discussion link above. --A. B.(talk • contribs) 00:43, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
The link to the "ISO 17799 Newsletter" looks like yet another SD link - at least the newsletter promotes SD. NoticeBored (talk) 20:26, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
No, it is another direct competitor site to... YOURS (iso27001security.com). You seem to be using linkage (and sometimes even not) to SD, which is only vendor site anyway, to try to clear competitor sites from Wikipedia. Please do NOT use Wikipedia as a competitor market place or for indirect self gain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 09:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Not sure where to post questions, but isn't there only 11 clauses? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 00:38, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia isn't a forum. Please address subject questions to the developers of the standard, or to a center of interactive expertise. Sorry. 22.214.171.124 (talk) 09:37, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
The comment is a valid point. I checked ISO 27002 standard and found "This standard contains 11 security control clauses [...]". Indeed the mentioned Risk Assessment is a chapter in ISO 27002 but does not belong to the "main security categories". Because of this I suggest to remove it from the given article.