The section on "Future of STEP" is not acceptable this way. STEP-NC (AP 238 together with 224 and 240) addressed only one major area of STEP. Others major areas are ship, electric/electronic, and PLCS. For an encyclopedia it is not correct to provide crystal ball views of the future. So we should focus on actual and past facts only and avoid making predictions into the future. A dedicated page for STEP-NC is welcome Lothartklein 15:07, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Dear Lotharrklein I wrote the section "Future of STEP" a few months ago (with a different IP address than this one) I agree with you wikipedia should remove this section (and not put it back after I try to remove it) sorry for putting it up on the first place.
I worked on the Spanish version and i created the Italian and Portuguese sections of the STEP/ISO 10303. Please le me know what you think.