Talk:I Don't Like the Drugs (But the Drugs Like Me)
 | I Don't Like the Drugs (But the Drugs Like Me) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 22, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:IDLTD.jpg[edit]
Image:IDLTD.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 01:45, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Marilyn manson i don't like the drugs.jpg[edit]
Image:Marilyn manson i don't like the drugs.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 06:14, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
GA Review[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:I Don't Like the Drugs (But the Drugs Like Me)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Homeostasis07 (talk · contribs) 22:03, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
I'll be reviewing this over the next few hours. Homeostasis07 (talk) 22:03, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
You may have seen me editing over the past few hours. There were a couple of typos, a couple of things that I've rephrased, and I've re-titled a sub-section. Also, the personnel section needed some alphabetizing, and there were a few international charts missing from the charts sub-section. I find it quicker to be bold and do these things myself, rather than post a big list here of tiny little things that need doing. This is clearly a well-written article, with verifiable statements sourced to reliable sources. Happy to promote it.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
Congratulations, once again, Magic. Homeostasis07 (talk) 01:39, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Features a Gospel choir?[edit]
The backing vocals on the song doesn't sound like a Gospel choir to me. It sounds more like Motown: a mix a R&B and Soul. When I hear them sing the refrain "I don't like the drugs but the drugs like me..." I'm not reminded of "Amazing Grace", I'm reminded more of Diana Ross and The Supremes - complete with big afros and shimmering silver dresses. The rest of the article is right. There's lots of 70's funk and soul going on in the song. -Red marquis (talk) 23:12, 3 January 2019 (UTC)