Talk:Image organizer

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Comments[edit]

missing: Aperture_(photography_software)

hallo, I want to point your attention to Antony. As I am the author, I think there is a conflict of interest. Thus please review the application and decide on its addition to wikipedia. Kind regards, RausH (140.78.123.56 (talk) 21:58, 24 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]

missing: Adobe Photoshop Elements (Organizer function)[edit]

Hi, Adobe Photoshop Elements Organizer is missing. Here's a first draft:

Adobe Photoshop Elements (Organizer) Windows Commercial Metadata: Yes but I do not know for certain which metadata standards are supported Geotagging: yes but buggy per Adobe forums Facial recognition: yes Synchronize with online library: Flickr, maybe others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hatsandcats (talk • contribs) 00:55, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IrfanView[edit]

Removed IrfanView from Image Organiser list as Image Viewer only. Jaqian (talk) 13:02, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retention of Exif, IPTC and XMP metadata already embedded in the image file itself[edit]

Ye gods. I heard horror stories about one of the GNOME image organizers (clobbering the date), but is this something we have to worry about with all image organizers? Digikam hasn't let me down so far (but I'm looking to see if there's a better alternative). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.53.68.233 (talk) 14:59, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions[edit]

It would seem that the standard would be to have the list of the software separately and referenced from the article, an that would allow the article to cover the subject in an encyclopaedic fashion. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:05, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there no distinction between embedded and separate tags?[edit]

The article makes no distinctions between programs viewing/editing tags that are embedded within the image files, and tags that are contained external to them. (either in a database that the program has, and/or in a metadata-file or something) It would be nice, if there was mention of whether or not they automatically edit/modify tags (of either variety), and if it distinguishes between editing embedded tags and external/database tags, but just having the embedded/external distinction, at the very least…--98.128.228.237 (talk) 23:55, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]