Talk:Impeachment of Warren Hastings

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

India: History

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup.

[Untitled][edit]

Seriously biased article on an important subject.Shtove (talk) 00:16, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Impeachment and acquittal of Andrew Johnson which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:30, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One-sided, simplistic history[edit]

This article ends by throwing it's hands up, as to why Hastings was impeached in the first place. That in itself shows how derelict it is. It quotes staunch supporters of Hastings as if they lack any interest in his acquittal, despite their service in the East India Company. Burke's complex arguments are ignored. The treatment of Indians is treated as a "he said, she said" issue, when facts exist. In fact, it's a disgrace to Indians, with it's tacit approval of the means necessary to establish British rule. A bad article that should be rewritten. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.80.117.214 (talk) 07:15, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutism[edit]

Did Warren Hastings practice absolutism? 2601:47:4084:C9F0:D4D1:BFA9:AB42:ED68 (talk) 02:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]