I think it should be made clear that the information contained here applies to humans, and may be inaccurate for many other species. Not to nitpick, but food animal reproduction (for example) is a pretty big industry, and I can imagine someone interested in animal pregnancy searching for "implanation" on Wikipedia.
I agree, this is a human only article. It should be named something else. 188.8.131.52 (talk) 20:03, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
It also isn't written for humans. This article is filled to the brim with medical babble. --184.108.40.206 (talk) 19:58, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
The name has now been changed, but that leaves the issue of where implantation in other species should be described. Given that it's mostly the same, it seems it would be a rather trivial content fork to create such an article. Anaxial (talk) 10:01, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
it is stated that if something is wrong implantion won't occur and there will be miscarriage. well, how can there be miscarriage if there was no implantation? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 20:18, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Support; I don't see an obvious primary topic. PowersT 01:35, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
semi support I agree the disambiguation page should be moved, but I think this should be renamed to Implantation (human embryo) per the first section of this talk page, as this is a human-only article, not a general live-birth article. 18.104.22.168 (talk) 20:05, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.