Talk:Impossible Princess

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Impossible Princess has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Kylie Minogue (Rated GA-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kylie Minogue, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Kylie Minogue and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is also within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful musical resource on recordings from a variety of genres.
 
WikiProject Australia / Music (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon Impossible Princess is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (marked as Mid-importance).
 

Contents

[edit] Good Article nomination has failed

The Good article nomination for Impossible Princess has failed, for the following reason:

While the referencing is decent where used, sources outside Minogue's own website should be found. Also, the "Singles" and "Cover Artwork" sections are wholly unsourced as are large parts of "Making of the record". Finally, more as a style point than a GA requirement, the Release details section could use a serious re-tooling as it looks very strange right now. Staxringold 14:52, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
I have addressed the issues with references and reformatted the "release details" section, placing them into a table. I have now renomianted the article.Underneath-it-All 16:16, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

I've approved it as a Good Article. Congrats! Briancua 13:22, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sales totals

Please do not change sales totals unless you can source you claims. Thanks. -- Underneath-it-All 15:24, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Critical response

In the first paragraph of the Critical response section, one quote is attributed to two magazines. Could someone figure this out, please? Cricketgirl 04:23, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing this out. I've added the correct reference now. -- Underneath-it-All 14:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Copyedit

Please see PROOFREADER'S NOTES in hidden comments for questions/explanation of changes.

[edit] Genre?

What songs from Impossible Princess are indie-rock? 60.230.2.29|Guest

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:KylieMinogueDidItAgain.ogg

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:KylieMinogueDidItAgain.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 12:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] GA reassessment per WP:SWEEPS

This article is being reassessed as part of the GA SWEEPS. It has been found to generally comply with GA standards. However, there is a problem with a couple of claims/statements that are not referenced. These need to be addressed. Either references should be found or the information removed. The reassessment has been put on hold for a period of 7 days to give editors time to fix the concerns. If you have any queries, please don't hesitate to contact me. ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 11:31, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export