|WikiProject Law||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
If you google for "R v Whitehouse (1995) 1 Cr. App. R. 420", or even "R v Whitehouse (1995)", the only result is the Wikipedia incitement article....
- Law sources are not always searchable in the same way that, Britney's outfit on Tuesday night is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 01:20, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
The case reported at  1 Cr App R 420 is R v Pickford, which is also mentioned in the article. It is probably a mistake. It is probably meant to refer to R v Whitehouse  QB 868. James500 (talk) 06:19, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Not sure why James wants to link to a botanical article when the cannabis being cultivated is clearly as a drug. Seems to em that linking to the drug is strictly non-controversial here whereas linking to a botany article is completely irrelevant♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 14:46, 10 January 2014 (UTC)