Talk:Independent business
 | This is the talk page of a redirect that redirects to the page: • Privately held company Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Privately held company |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 8 June 2021. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
AQA controversy[edit]
Don't think the AQA controversy is related at all. Especially as the section is opinionated and has zero sources. If you keep the section, maybe have a more neutral stance and views from both sides? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.149.217.142 (talk) 12:20, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- @109.149.217.142: Yep, I agree with you. I don't think it's notable enough to be included on this Wikipedia page, possibly (only possibly), on the AQA GCSE page (if there is one). I know that there are news articles about it (like the one in the {{press}} template above) but I don't think even these warrant its inclusion. Seagull123 Φ 17:37, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
I've just removed the GCSE bit from the article for the reasons given above. If you disagree, please discuss here/revert. Seagull123 Φ 22:00, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 24 May 2016[edit]
NOT A BIOLOGY QUESTION — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.56.66 (talk) 17:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Not done @88.109.56.66: If you would like to request a change to be made, please do it in the format of "please change XXXX to YYYY". Have a look at the {{Edit semi-protected}} template for more information. Thanks! Seagull123 Φ 20:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
