The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Please supply full citations when adding information, and consider tagging or removing unciteable information.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
rahul ji muje bi congress party ka neta banna h isliya muje aapke supoort ki jarurt h mera name sunil saini h me bi desh ke liye kuch acha kerna chahta hu me india ke rajasthan sete ki rajdani jaipur me niwas karta hu aapka pyara bhai sunil saini.. muje bi congress party me shyamil hona h muje bi congress party ka neta banna h....mere mob:9587733366. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk • contribs) 11:05, 6 July 2014
WP:RS r/w WP:V permits any user to delete unsourced material on sight. see - "Wikipedia does not publish original research", "Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed." etc.
Furthermore, the WP:INDICSCRIPT RfC consensus was The consensus is to remove the scripts and replace them with IPA to clarify the pronunciation - DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 19:08, 4 February 2012 (UTC) see diff.
Now if User:Kkm010 disagrees with that consensus, and how it was surreptitiously arrived at on the talk page of the closing admin, we could jointly revisit that consensus which was applied on Aam Aadmi Partyhere only a few week ago. Gollymemolly (talk) 15:45, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
OK, I agree with your point of view as far as script is concern. But, don't remove other materials as you did in that article. Some through discussion are required in order to removed all those ideology's.--♥ Kkm010 ♥♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 04:33, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
The discussion can begin once you provide reliable sources for the deleted content. Until then I am following policy and established consensus to improve this article. Gollymemolly (talk) 04:43, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Naming the political party's own website as a source "about themselves, especially in articles about themselves" is allowable under WP:SELFSOURCE. I don't see that the party's website supports the plethora of ideologies that have made it into the article, but it's likely that such a large party, appealing to diverse interests and having a long history, would have a plethora of ideologies.
If you read the underlying RfC discussion resulting in the WP:INDICSCRIPT policy, you'll see that the banning of such scripts was pertinent to biographies of living persons where there was a questionable rationale for a particular script being used. In the case of a major Indian political party, where the Hindi/Devanagari script is part of the party's official logo, the use of the script in the article lead/infobox would be more justifiable. Dhtwiki (talk) 05:34, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
You cannot remove unless high level of consensus is achieved regarding ideology. Moreover "Political position" and "International affiliation" section, credible source has been provided. Only in ideology section sources are required. Thank You--♥ Kkm010 ♥♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 12:59, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Note Gollymolly has been indeffed by a checkuser, this discussion is effectively over. Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:52, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
I saw a warning on Gollymolly's Talk page, against edit-warring, but no block and certainly no injunction against joining the discussion here, which, as far as I'm concerned, he's welcome to do, however unsatisfying he might find it, given the number of editors who have objected to his stance. Dhtwiki (talk) 12:19, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
In the map showing INC Presence in various states the state sikkim is colored light blue but in the sikkim legislature Sikkim Krantikari Morcha is the principal opposition party. INC doesnot have any presence in sikkim legislature hence it should be colored dark blue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 14:03, 26 December 2014 (UTC)