Talk:Infrared search and track

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I read somewhere that the Luftwaffe was developing a basic type of IRST for night fighters in WW2. Royzee 18:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Feb 20 07[reply]

You're thinking of "Spanner", it was just IR, not IRST. It was basically a night sight that stuck through the canopy and let the pilot take quick looks while trying to fly. They fitted it to early night fighters, and it proved to be basically useless. Actually pretty much everyone was trying this in the 30's, the Navy was using them in the US, and there was a Cambridge-led program in the UK too. Maury 00:02, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just thinking that given the new information that has come to light about the Russian Mig-35 OLS that there should be a major update to this section. The OLS is a whole new generation of IRST systems, providing 360 degree coverage, alerting the pilot of missile launches and heading and giving range finding at a massive 15km. Its that large an advancement it warrants an article pointing out that this system in the era of stealth aircraft may even make radars redundant. According to some rudimentary mathemetics you can determine that this system can fire on aircraft such as the F-22A at greater ranges then the best Russian radars.

unsubstantiated claims[edit]

jf-17's are not currently known to have any irst capability. Have corrected for that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.161.187 (talk) 05:19, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

unlimited?[edit]

The exception to the scanning technique is the F-35 JSF's DAS, which stares in all directions simultaneously, and automatically detects and declares aircraft and missiles in all directions, without a limit to the number of targets simultaneously tracked.

No limit? So you can track 1 trillion targets simultaneously if you want?

192.91.173.42 (talk) 15:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

unlimited?[edit]

"The exception to the scanning technique is the F-35 JSF's DAS, which stares in all directions simultaneously, and automatically detects and declares aircraft and missiles in all directions, without a limit to the number of targets simultaneously tracked."

No limit? So you can track 1 trillion targets simultaneously if you want?

192.91.173.42 (talk) 15:28, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Infra-red search and track. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:22, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Infra-red search and track. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:11, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]