|WikiProject Computer Security / Computing|
Integer arithmetics are frequently used in computer programs on all types of systems, since floating-point operations may incur higher overhead (depending on processor capabilities).
Floating-point operations may or may not actually be more expensive than integer arithmetic on given hardware. I think there are much better reasons to use integers instead of floats: integers are exact and give you more precision than floats of the same size. For example, in a 32-bit integer, you get 32 bits of precision, whereas an IEEE single precision float, which also takes 32 bits, provides only 24 bits of precision (23 bits mantissa, and the sign bit). When the numbers you're trying to represent are integers (or even rationals with a common denominator), you're therefore better off using ints.
Inglorion 09:27, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
I think this makes sense as two different articles. Integer overflow is of particular interest in computer security and is reference from the computer security page. The content on this article is currently underdeveloped and could be significantly expanded. Rcseacord 18:10, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Merge with arithmetic overflow
Wrap around, Signed/Unsigned, mixed message
From the article:
- Since an arithmetic operation may produce a result larger than the maximum representable value, a potential error condition may result. In the C programming language, signed integer overflow causes undefined behavior, while unsigned integer overflow causes the number to be reduced modulo a power of two, meaning that unsigned integers "wrap around" on overflow. This "wrap around" is the cause of the famous "Split Screen" in Pac-Man.
- A "wrap around" corresponds to the fact, that e.g. if the addition of two positive integers produces an overflow, it may result in a negative number. In counting, one just starts over again from the bottom.
- Example: 16 bit signed integer: 30000 + 30000 = −5536.
The example given here of a negative number resulting from addition is an example of a signed integer overflow, but its usage immediately after the statement about C programming behavior is contradictory. I don't know enough about C programming to know whether the statement that "signed overflow produces undefined behavior, while unsigned overflow produces wrap around" is accurate or transposed. If it is accurate, the example should be changed to, perhaps, 35000 + 35000 = 4464; otherwise, the words "signed" and "unsigned" words should be swapped to be accurate in the preceding statement. 188.8.131.52 (talk) 14:15, 29 October 2013 (UTC)