 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
 Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
[edit] Date of founding?
I arrived here from Mainstream_Science_on_Intelligence, which discusses an editorial which appears to have been (re)published in this journal in 1997, yet this page claims that the journal was founded in 2000. I suspect there may be transfers from one publisher to another involved or similar. Does anyone know and can they edit the article(s) to remove the inconsistency? Martinp (talk) 23:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
[edit] editorial board
I was asked to have a look. There is fairly general agreement here that the listing of all the members of an editorial board, no matter how distinguished, is promotional. (the only person who disagreed in the last discussion seems to have been representing a journal publisher). It is additionally wrong to use external links within the body of an article in any context at all for people who do not have Wikipedia pages-- see WP:EL This is not encyclopedic information--it is perfectly visible on the publisher's site, which is where it belongs. If the publisher wishes, he is certainly encouraged to link distinguished scientist's names on his site to their Wikipedia biographies. That's a reasonable use of Wikipedia. We are here for the purpose of providing information about notable people for use wherever it is wanted. We are not here for the purpose of providing internal links to puff out an article--and a journal like this that hardly needs it.
What it does need is:
- a list of all former editors in chief
- Clarification of just what is the first issue, and the frequency of publication.
- The current impact factor from JCR, and, if desired, number of articles published.
- Circulation figures, which can be sourced from various places, including Ulrich's
- The major indexing services in its field that include it.
- The number of libraries having subscriptions
- references to the journal itself in other published works.
- just possibly, a list of the two or three most famous articles that have been published in the journal. (the fame can be taken to be = most cited, in order to have a reference for the fact)
DGG (talk) 22:06, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Intelligence Citations Bibliography for Articles Related to IQ Testing
This article could be considerably improved by discussing how this journal fits among other psychology journals that publish articles on similar topics. You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of Intelligence Citations, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in those issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by suggesting new sources through comments on that page. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 14:56, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
