Talk:International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
|International Bank for Reconstruction and Development has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.|
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
Information on governance would be important here
This article would greatly benefit from information on governance and decision making by the IBRD. "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" makes the claim that the IBRD is a major factor in producing Third World poverty. John D. Croft (talk) 09:40, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- This review is transcluded from Talk:International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
(a) the prose is clear and concise, respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct; and (b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
I find the article to be clear and concise, grammatical, and in compliance.
2. Factually accurate and verifiable:
(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; (b) it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; and (c) it contains no original research.
Article appears factually accurate and is definitely verifiable.
3. Broad in its coverage:
(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
Gives good coverage.
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each.
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Illustrated, if possible, by images:
(a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and (b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
No suitable images available.