Talk:Iris printer

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

March 10, created talk page, Added NPOV flag. Article is promotional in nature, is written to pormote a product/propriatary technology.

Wrong description and redundant[edit]

I have re-written this article because it was describing the wrong thing. Title is "Iris printer" so it should describe an Iris printer - not just one of the trade name products produced on the Iris printer re: "Giclee" or "Iris" fine art prints. This article in its original form was partly a redundant version of the Giclee article. I have incorporate usable martial from this article into Giclee and moved some content from Giclee here. Fountains of Bryn Mawr 21:48, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

'noted for the low cost of their consumables'[edit]

Low cost consumables? I owned an IRIS..they were one of the thirstiest, most expensive proofers I've ever had. It might as well have had inks (dye) made of champagne:) HAD that is; these printers are long long gone now. The deflection system meant that every printed page consumed the same amount of ink...also too the ink had to be continuously purged by the printer; if you left it without making prints it would empty out in a few days and require a few hundred bucks worth of replacement "ink"/dye (unsigned)

The low cost claim was relative to the process IRIS was intended to replace -- Dupont Chromalin -- which was around US$50 a page. An IRIS proof could be made on any paper, so the only cost was the inks (actually they were water based dyes). I suspect, though I can't cite a reference, that if you compared the operating cost of an IRIS printer to that of a modern drop-on-demand ink jet printer using the same paper, the IRIS printer would win hands down. Jameslwoodward (talk) 15:05, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I worked there from 93 to 96. The paper was special, you couldn't feed it any kind of paper. And yes, you're firing a million drops of ink per second at the page. The majority of the drops picked up a charge as they left the nozzle, and then deflected into a gutter. I have no idea how much the ink and paper cost, because it was there for the taking.

--- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.180.19.82 (talk) 18:18, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify my comment above -- you could, as I said, print on anything that you could wrap around the drum -- I have a souvenir printed on fine sandpaper (Norton Abrasives was thinking about using one to print trade show handouts) -- but you got better results with better paper, just as a modern, drop-on-demand ink jet can print on ordinary paper, but does better if you give it better paper. . . Jim - Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 19:17, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization[edit]

While the company used "IRIS" in a stylized font as a logo, the corporate name was first "Iris Graphics, LLC", and then from 1986, "Iris Graphics, Inc." The product was the "Iris printer". The name came from Iris, the personification of the rainbow, which seemed appropriate to a color printer. . . Jim - Jameslwoodward (talk to me • contribs) 11:53, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Drivers[edit]

if anyone has information or links to drivers to run this printer please post it. theres no information on the article about what kind of computers or drivers are needed to run this printer, etc. I know that it needs a special control board but im not certain if this machine can only run from macintosh based computers or if its possible to run it using a windows based pc.

does anyone have the physical specs of this printer, as in weight, height, etc etc? does anyone know the difference between a 3047 and a 3047g model, anyone know exact years of manufacture? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.170.55.168 (talk) 02:24, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The original Iris printers (3044, 3024) ran only from specially modified PCs. Data was supplied from a half inch tape drive (remember, this was 1985 and a full size image took 250 megabytes of data -- more than could be stored on the largest disk that could be attached to a PC of that time). A 3044 is the size of a desk, but around four feet tall. . . Jim - Jameslwoodward (talk to me • contribs) 11:42, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Iris printer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111008001336/http://www.photography.org/interviews/holbert.php to http://www.photography.org/interviews/holbert.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:17, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Iris printer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130122062546/http://www.gicleedirectory.com/gicleeindustry.html to http://www.gicleedirectory.com/gicleeindustry.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:39, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dots or not?[edit]

These two sentences in the article seem to be in contradiction with each other: "Iris printers use a continuous flow ink system to produce continuous-tone dot free output." vs. "Unlike most ink jet printers which fire drops only when needed, the IRIS printer's four 1-micrometer glass jets operate continuously under high pressure, vibrated by a piezoelectric crystal to produce drops at a 1 MHz rate." Th55 (talk) 11:40, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]