Talk:Ishigaki Airport

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merger of Southwest Air Lines Flight 611[edit]

The Southwest Air Lines Flight 611 was the only significant aircraft accident at Ishigaki Airport. there was a separate article for flight 611 that was nominated for deletion on February 8 2012. per that discussion, the concensus was that the flight 611 article be merged into the parent article for Ishigaki airport. I have started that merger process and invite any further input. I felt that it was most fair to first merge the articles in their entirety, then leave further editing open for discussion. I have blanked the original flight 611 page and redirected here. Paffordmd72 (talk) 22:57, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paffordmd72 (talk) 23:16, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clean Up[edit]

The following series of edits have been made in order to clean up after the Southwest Air Lines Flight 611 article was merged here. First, the sections of the flight 611 text were restructured here[1] Paffordmd72 (talk) 14:37, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then removed the "nominated for deletion" tag here[2] Paffordmd72 (talk) 14:57, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Then moved the flight 611 section to the main text of the airport article here[3]. My reasoning for replacing the section is that the accident is part of the history of the airport and therefore needed to be after the history section. I also reason that locating the text of the accident within the history section does not give it the attention it demands and therefore it needs to remain its own section.Paffordmd72 (talk) 15:20, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Then gathered links here[4]. Paffordmd72 (talk) 15:58, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Then relocated "Notes" section here[5]. Paffordmd72 (talk) 16:05, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Then gathered categories and lists[6]. Paffordmd72 (talk) 16:11, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And finally, removed the "clean up" tag here[7]. I would not suggest that the article is completely clean or perfect, but I believe I have fixed all the issues that caused the tag to be added in the first place and therefore I removed it so that others can give there opinion. Paffordmd72 (talk) 16:15, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ishigaki Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:53, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no second military use[edit]

The airport's area is by now (2019) largely taken over by the city. The Terminal is a hospital, most of the runway is removed, with a short strip of about 400m left yet untouched. The only aviation still going on there is a pad for the EMS helicopter, near the old firestation, which is now a regular firestation. Like in Shimojishima Airport people likely faught tooth and nail to keep out the military. Besides, moving the Airport out of the city was (besides the runway length) for safety and noise reasons. Turning the airport over for military use (with the accompanying loss of binding safety and environmental regulations) really makes no sense. --133.56.199.80 (talk) 08:24, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]