|WikiProject Religious texts||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
I removed the following sentence (inserted by 126.96.36.199) which I thought was a little pov:
Coleman never produced satisfactory documentation to support his claims, however.
The rest of the external link, besides the title, is a little pov'ed as well, but I let it stay there because I thought I'd be reverted anyway. So you all decide. Aaрон Кинни (t) 11:06, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
This is an extraordinarily vague article. Is anyone going to add what the gist of the book's vision or ideology is? ThePeg 22:08, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
The topic is notable enough and significant enough within its field to warrant it's own article. However, the previous version was unacceptable for an encyclopedia. I restored the article from the redirect and deleted all un-sourced info (most of it). Additionally, I added a discussion from two scholarly sources that summarize the book's significance to justify keeping the article on as a stub. The page still badly needs attention, however, as the topic does have potential for expansion.Flygongengar (talk) 22:52, 29 May 2012 (UTC) (also 188.8.131.52 (talk) 05:07, 15 March 2013 (UTC))