Talk:Isothiocyanate

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Chemistry (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Medicine / Hematology-oncology (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that this article follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Hematology-oncology task force (marked as Low-importance).
 

PEITC , watercress and cancer[edit]

PEITC may warrant its own article. It may have anticancer properties : [ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20546646 Br J Nutr. 2010 Jun 15:1-9. In vivo modulation of 4E binding protein 1 (4E-BP1) phosphorylation by watercress: a pilot study. ]. Rod57 (talk) 14:52, 15 October 2010 (UTC)


Relationship to P53[edit]

The related article cited says nothing of isothiocyanate "binding" to P53 proteins. Rather, it states that sulforaphane in Broccoli sprouts was noted to be particularly effective at inhibiting growth in cancers that exhibit a p53 mutation.

A better citation and description: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/67/13/6409.full

WP:MEDRS[edit]

Can anybody see a problem with referring to the Linus Pauling Institute? To me, they are a secondary or review source, and anybody iz welcome to use them, even in preference to Pub Med. 137.186.43.70 (talk) 15:47, 2 July 2012 (UTC)