Talk:Isratin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Israel (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Palestine (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 


Merge[edit]

It was proposed that Saif al-Islam Qaddafi's Isratin proposal be merged into Isratine. Please vote Support or Oppose.
Relisted.Greyshark09 (talk) 07:29, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

  • Support - same issue, we don't need an article on each person who supports the initiative.Greyshark09 (talk) 18:40, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Comment - after more than a year after issuing the merger proposal, the merge has been completed due to lack of public interest.Greyshark09 (talk) 11:42, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Labour Party Stance[edit]

The highlighted text is incorrect: "On the Israeli side, Likud and Labour both opposed withdrawal to the pre-1967 borders or setting up a Palestinian state, and both supported building more Jewish settlements in the territories and maintaining exclusive Israeli control over Jerusalem. However, Labour argued for building strategic settlements only in areas Israel intended to keep, such as the Jordan Valley and the surroundings of East Jerusalem, while handing the rest back to Jordan, claiming that the alternative would result in a bi-national state and so "the end of the Zionist endeavour"."

As far as I know the official stance of the Israeli Labour party is supportive of a two-state solution with no involvement of the state of Jordan. The party's website is down for some reason, I'll provide sources when it's online again. EitanTs (talk) 19:14, 28 April 2015 (UTC)